|
Open
it up
and get a hit?
The
general advice on
bunker chokes one
usually hears is to use
Improved Modified (IM) and Full with the 24 gram load in
bunker. So
what, exactly, is "IM" as a choke dial measurement? Similarly, what,
exactly,
is "Full" choke? Perazzi, judging by its catalogs, suggest that for
Olympic trap chokes, on the choke measurement dial, IM is to equal 28
thou and Full is to
equal 40 thou. Considering Perazzi's status in the bunker world, the 28
(0.71 mm) and 40 (1.0 mm) numbers would
pretty much be the gold
standard.
To test this standard, below are the
results of pattern tests with first barrel choking from 0.015 (0.38 mm)
to 0.042
(1.07 mm) thousandths. And second barrel choking from 0.042 (1.07 mm)
to 0.033 (0.84 mm). Since
previous testing had shown that the maximum
effective pattern width was 24
(61 cm) inches, and
any pellet strikes outside that circle were totally random and could
not be relied upon to
consistently break a target,
no
attempt was made to add the 24 to 30" taurus count to the
table.
First
barrel tests:
30
yard
(27.4 m) choke comparison run details: load was Remington STS case with
enough
Hodgdon
TiteWad powder for chronograph-verified 1250'/s, Remington
209P primer, (old/original, softer) Winchester
12L GRAY wad, 24
grams of Black Diamond
8's,
335 pellet count average per shell. Same
lot of components used for all 9 pattern runs. Each shell's components
were scaled to
insure
consistency. Barrel
cleaned
before each session.
Weather very
similar for each session, with temperatures in the 80's. Patterns were
fired over the course
of
a month at sea level. Choke tubes
were Briley X2's, except
0.030 and
0.043; Seminoles. All tubes were
verified to
be
exact with the same Perazzi barrel used throughout.
Choke
Dimension |
10"
Core |
20"
Taurus |
Total |
% |
24"
Taurus |
Total |
% |
90mm
Hole
Count |
| 0.015 |
100 |
148 |
248 |
75 |
45 |
293 |
89 |
2.125 |
| 0.019 |
118 |
154 |
273 |
83 |
35 |
308 |
93 |
2 |
| 0.023 |
143 |
138 |
280 |
85 |
30 |
311 |
94 |
3 |
| 0.025 |
146 |
142 |
288 |
87 |
25 |
313 |
95 |
5 |
| 0.028 |
135 |
149 |
283 |
86 |
32 |
315 |
95 |
3.88 |
| 0.030 |
146 |
147 |
293 |
89 |
28 |
321 |
97 |
3.5 |
| 0.033 |
146 |
149 |
295 |
89 |
26 |
320 |
97 |
3.75 |
| 0.042 |
155 |
138 |
292 |
89 |
28 |
320 |
97 |
3 |
Looking
over the table,
you will note that
opening the choke weakens the 10" circle –
the pattern's core
–
and does
little to
"juice up" the
outer 20" to 24" taurus. The 10" to 20" taurus pellet count
shows little change. The 20 to 24" taurus change is practically
meaningless as there is so much area to cover here. Yes, some
additional pellets
clustered around the outside of the 24" circle with the more open
chokes, but
these cluster locations
inconsistently wandered around from sheet to sheet and were not
uniformily expanded from the 24" circle. In other words, the more open
chokes did not uniformly
open up the pattern. With the tighter choke
designations,
there were virtually no pellets seen outside the 24" circle.
A
comment
on
results of using 7 1/2's in place of the 8's shown above:
you'll see about a 12% lower
pellet
count, depending on shot sizing and grading quality.
Expect also an increase in hole
count, (poorer
pattern uniformity) due to that
12% lower pellet number. Increasing velocity
can also be expected to drop pattern percentages by about 8% for a 50
'/s
increase, again depending on component quality.
On
the bunker, the
tighter chokes produced first barrel
target ink stains in the sky when properly centered. It
seems pretty clear that
a
target is unlikely to slip through the tighter
choke's pattern. As you would expect, the
much more
open chokes rarely produced smoke and
often gave rather "chunky" breaks leaving several larger chips/bits to
shoot
at with the second
barrel. These poor quality breaks also raise the question of
whether some targets are occasionally slipping through a now
too-weak center pattern.
In summary,
it appears that just "opening it up" by screwing in a
slightly more open (2 - 4 thousandth) choke may well have no
significant effect at all on
the pattern.
Installing a dramatically more open choke, IC
through modified, does put more pellets around the outside of a
24" pattern but only by weakening the center pattern core,
possibly eliminating an otherwise guaranteed break in the
case of a perfectly centered target.
It appears
from the above runs
that there may
well be
a
first barrel "get-a-hit" choke and it would
be around a modified in the above chart done at 30 yards—or
choke on
the minimum side for the distance
you normally break targets. Carefully
kept first-barrel comparison scores will show
if this
is valid for the individual shooter.
Some
patterning absolutely needs to be done to verify this choice with
the
cartridges to be used, especially when using 7
1/2's at Euro 1350'/s (412m/s) velocities. Enough testing has to be
done
to confirm pattern consistencies i.e. that the shell and choke
combination does not deliver significant, occasional drops in pattern
percentage(s) that will result in a lost target. (An
occasional 10% dropout—one
choke designation—is not unusual with some component
combinations.)
However,
it should be
remembered
the real
problem with the "open it up and get a hit" approach is
that there is little
feedback in terms of a smoked target from a dense, center pattern core
to indicate
that they are doing everything right, and so scoring improvement is
slowed.
Second
barrel choke dimension tests:
35
yard
(32 m) "full" choke comparison run details: load was Federal Gold Medal
plastic target with enough
Alliant Red Dot powder for chronograph-verified 1315'/s,
Federal
209A primer, Bascheri and Pellegri T2 wad, 24
grams (370 grains) West Coast High antimony shot. (This component
combination proved to be good, although a very few other combinations
have shown better results. . . At least there were no holes in the 10"
core circle as is sometimes seen!) Load data from Precision
Reloading. Same
lot of components used for all 5 pattern runs. Each shell's
components
were scaled-measured to
insure
consistency. Barrel
cleaned
before each session.
Weather
very
similar for each session, with temperatures in the 80's. Patterns were
fired over the course
of
a month, wind level permitting. All choke tubes
were Seminoles. All tubes were
bore-mic verified to
be
exact with the same Perazzi barrel used throughout.
Choke
Dimension |
10"
Core |
20"
Taurus |
Total |
24"
Taurus |
Total
|
% |
+/-
Dev |
90mm
Hole 24"
Count |
90mm
Hole 20"
Count |
| Fixed 0.042 |
72 |
115 |
186 |
45 |
232 |
79 |
+7/-6 |
3.4 |
0.80 |
| 0.042 Tube |
75 |
119 |
194 |
44 |
238 |
81 |
+7/-8 |
3.2 |
0.73 |
| 0.039 Tube |
75 |
114 |
189 |
43 |
232 |
79 |
+5/-5 |
2.5 |
0.67 |
| 0.036 Tube |
77 |
116 |
193 |
42 |
236 |
79 |
+7/-6 |
3.5 |
0.53 |
| 0.033 Tube |
77 |
119 |
196 |
41 |
238 |
81 |
+5/-6 |
3.6 |
0.44 |
In
comparing the second barrel runs, there is little core core count or
total pattern percentage difference
as the choke is opened up. (The results can be expected to change
around
on retest and with different components and choke contours/brands.)
What does
change
is the
uniformity or quality of the pattern in the 20 inch core. It noticibly
improves as the choke is opened. Again, these results will vary with
choke contours and load selection.
The 90 mm
hole counts, H1 and the new H2,
are an attempt to learn how
uniform the patterns are for comparison between chokes and loads. The
second, holes within the 20" circle, has been added to compare the
circles. As you can see, there's quite a difference. Perhaps the 24
gram load should be considered to have only an effective 20" pattern. .
.
Complete data from the five runs summarized above is here (PDF). Additional explanation is also included.
The above
picture shows a oft-seen extreme artifact from the 40
thousandth
choking level: row
stringing. Notice the open areas to the upper right. The 10"
circle of this particular pattern is to the lower left. This stringing
effect goes away with the pellets
distributed more evenly giving the patterns better uniformity
as the choking
is opened to the 33 to 36 (0.8 to 0.9 mm) thousands region.

The above
illustrates the reason to have dense, uniform patterns. The three dome
hits
obviously didn't break this NASTA target. If the background
was
clear
blue sky
and you were fortunate enough to have a very experienced referee,
he/she would have called the target dead from the chip(s?) that flew
off
from
the center-left hole. To be sure of getting a
target on the board, you pretty much have to put pellets into the rim
ring area and out as shown by the arrow. Having that high quality,
dense/tight
and uniform
pattern increases the odds of pellets hitting the rim area when you've
done your job.
In
summary,
it appears, as expected, that the Perazzi
recommendations of 28 and 40 thou (0.7 and 1.0 mm or Perazzi #7 and
#10) choking are excellent ones. They will
serve you well, especially if you favor fixed chokes for their
simplicity.
However, for
tournament level performance,
the above pattern runs suggest that it is worth while to
investigate opening up the choke very
slightly.
Probably the result will be a set of chokes in the area of 25 and 33
thou; the actual final numbers will depend on your cartridges and the
barrel itself. If
you are testing with factory-made cartridges, tests should confirm that
the lot used for adjustment is of expected standards of component
quality and velocity consistency and not a one-off
lot. A
change in components at the reloading bench (or a switch to a different
shell brand) will require careful re-testing to confirm that tournament
level
performance has followed the switch.
In
consideration of achieving tournement level
performance, a barrelmaster will be needed to tune a fixed choke gun. A
gun using choke tubes only requires screwing in choke tubes of the
desired
dial measurement (choke tube suppliers will confirm the dimension upon
request before shipment), then verifying the tube delivers the desired
pattern.
To expand
on the above: the following is a comparison between the virtues of
fixed vs. choke tubes:
Fixed
chokes:
-
The
simplest, no fuss, no worry approach.
-
Maintenance
minimal; clean them when you feel guilty. Well, at least once a month.
. . And definitely before a tournament.
-
No
worries
about a choke tube loosening (or whatever), then shooting out
and causing
permanent barrel damage. Or getting stuck in the barrel, preventing a
needed change.
-
No
additional expense of buying choke tubes.
-
No
choke tubes to keep track of or forget to pack.
-
No
simple way
to fine
tune – and $$$ to have a barrel
man do his magic (you'll want more than just a reamer run down
the barrels: see Derek's article Up
Tight on Choking)
–
for your one preferred shell. A tune-up optimization done with
one brand of shells
should
work well enough for most quality
shells.
-
Can be
damaged
accidently, requiring a barrelmaster to repair, if repairable.
-
Balance
adjustments can only be done by adding
weights to gun.
Choke
Tubes:
-
Practically
an infinite
number of
pattern quality adjustment/changes possible. Many different brands,
types, weights and styles to
select
from. Different brands of shells or component combinations likely can
be optimized using different brands and dimensions of choke tubes.
-
Give
ability to subtly fine-tune
the gun's balance and smoothness vs. speed to the target by selection
of choke type:
Extended or flush, standard vs. titanium weight (Examples: 2 regular
steel
flush chokes, weigh about 1.3 oz (36.5 grams). Titanium is noticibly
even lighter. 2
extended chokes weigh about 3 oz (83 grams).
-
Instant
ability to
adjust patterns for altitude, temperatures, field conditions, target
hardness and different shells.
Plus, makes gun very usable for occasional use in other disciplines, as
sporting clays or skeet.
-
If
damaged, easy and
economical to replace. No $$$ barrelmaster service needed.
-
Can
quickly and easily go
tighter for
training purposes.
-
More
maintenance and
care needed.
-
Constant
need to confirm
tightness in the barrel, some brands better than
others.
-
Probably
need cleaning
more than fixed. On the other hand, it's easy and quite fast to
pop a clean one in.
-
They
are an additional
expense and hassle.
As you can
see, there are good reasons both pro and con for fixed chokes
vs.
choke tubes when it's time to choose chokes for your next bunker
gun. For bunker use only and for the majority of non-seriously
competitive
shooters, the simplist, no fuss, no worry path is fixed chokes. The
Perazzi
recommendations of 28 and 40 thou (0.7 and 1.0 mm or Perazzi #7 and
#10) choking are excellent ones and leave the shooter with the future
option to optimize.
On
patterning
frames and plates
Patterning detail chart:
Left
arrow
points to the
10"
core
circle
Upper
arrow: 20" circle/ 10 to 20" taurus
Lower
arrow: 24" circle/20 to 24" taurus
Revised 10/2011
|